The expected SRM update - facts and test, pre & post patch?

Thread in 'MechWarrior Online' started by Lan, Apr 28, 2014.

  1. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,002
    578
    199
    Ok, let's see who can make the 1st 1K+ with the Kintaros. ;) I really find this Mech deserves so much more Reputation.. Really like this Missile Hardpoint Heavy Med -> Especially NOW after the SRM Patch. :)
     
  2. Solahma

    Solahma Star Lord

    2,279
    532
    197
    FYI, just heard it from Phil's stream again. The major coding change to SRMs has NOT been made live yet. It sounds like it might be in the May 6th patch, but no official word yet.

    So far it has just been HSR and visual explosion fixes to correct damage. It has resulted in improvements, but the major improvement is yet to come apparently.
     
  3. epikt

    epikt Benefactor

    2,511
    502
    104
    I ran a series of tests this morning, and it's not good.

    Build: Oxide with 4 SRM4s (5t) and XL280. No arties, SRM only.
    Pre-patch series (series A): April 29th
    Post-patch series (series B): May 2nd
    Both series count 10 games: 6 wins/4 loss on series A; 5 wins/5 loss on series B.

    Ping was pretty stable the whole sessions and similar on both series. Roughly 135-140 depending on the game, with only small fluctuations during a game (+/-2).
    It's a range of ping where I usually have decent hit registration (I noticed there is a "gap" when for some reason I'm over 160-170).

    On average, the damage dealt is pretty similar (A=428; B=419; -2%), but the number of missiles shot is higher in series B (A=349 ; B=390).
    => their efficiency (damage/theoretical max damage) is significantly lower on series B (53%) than on series A (60%)(that's a -11.3% variation).

    I must admit my aim sometimes seemed a bit off during the series B. But I'm not sure it can explain the difference.

    Just to be sure, I did not count best and worst games of each series, in order to reduce the influence of extremely good and bad performances.
    => the difference is lower but still significant:
    - out of the 8 median games: -7.8%
    - out of the 6 median games: -8.7%
    - out of the 4 median games: -8.5%

    My conclusion is (with all the reservations due to an uncontrolled test environment and a sometime sloppy aim) the patch certainly not improved my hit reg.
    Complementary test by someone in a similar ping-zone appreciated.
     
  4. Lan

    Lan Mech Wrangler

    1,570
    201
    79
    Ok, they have upped the damage in the latest patch.

    SRM2 – Damage up from 2.0 to 2.15 – Spread from 6 to 4.8
    SRM4 – Damage up from 2.0 to 2.15 – Spread from 6 to 5.2
    SRM6 – Damage up from 2.0 to 2.15 – Spread from 6 to 5.7


    Which invalidates our previous testing. And now they claim to have a permanent fix.

    Hm. So we need to redo the test, from scratch, if we want measurable results.
     
  5. Michael

    Michael Grand Poobah

    4,835
    829
    234
    This is actually why I stopped doing a lot of the video tests. The game has become more about "follow the bouncing ball" and will never be static. No point doing 2 hours or more of video work only to have it invalidated next week when they need to tweak things for the FOTM.
     
  6. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Yeah I'll admit I was doing the non scientific testing via a couple of mechs with heavy srm loads and.... never really saw much difference tbh so was never tempted to do a more organised test. :blush:
     
  7. Lan

    Lan Mech Wrangler

    1,570
    201
    79
    Yeah, true. It's annoying as hell but then again also somehow a little interesting aswell to have our own set of data as the SRM are iterated/evolved by the Devs.

    I think I will run my tests again, if nothing else to see (roughly) the scale of improvements we see. How much the Devs jump one major weapon group.
     
  8. epikt

    epikt Benefactor

    2,511
    502
    104
    I did few drops in SRM boats on the tests servers, and it feels really fine!
    (for example 750dmg with the Oxide, not even depleting the ammo)

    Unfortunately I don't think I'll have time to run a control series before the patch so I'll have to use my "old" test results, but I'll do post-patch testing next weak.
     
  9. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Just saying Summoner with a Streak SRM6 and 4-5 Streak SRM 4's .... watched one ripping up mechs like there was no tomorrow on the PTS as it leapt around like a mad dervish. :p

    Ran out two battles in my LG with 4 SRM 6 (2 ML as support). Didn't have any of those instances where you volley fire into a point blank pinned target and they barely take damage. Holding my breath a bit but fix seems to work.
     
  10. Lan

    Lan Mech Wrangler

    1,570
    201
    79
    Yeah, the PTS servers really did shine for SRM's. I had a lot of fun with clan ctreak sixes. :)

    I will do five plus five drops tonight on my selected builds. Will do it the easy way, record all games, drop in one build and upon death, exit and drop in the second.
     
  11. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Proper fix hits main tomorrow doesn't it?
     
  12. Lan

    Lan Mech Wrangler

    1,570
    201
    79
    Yepp. We will see a lot of distancekeeping now, let a SRM brawler in close and you will get your face torn off. ;)
     
  13. Excalibaard

    Excalibaard 101 010 Staff Member

    5,290
    1,110
    269
    Return of the 2xSRM4 jenner
     
  14. Lan

    Lan Mech Wrangler

    1,570
    201
    79
    I was just thinking the same, S7! There are quite a few lights that may come back now. Or that rare bird, the Kint? :)
     
  15. Excalibaard

    Excalibaard 101 010 Staff Member

    5,290
    1,110
    269
    Kintaros have been around, with 5xLRM5 or 5xSSRM2 most of the time :p
     
  16. epikt

    epikt Benefactor

    2,511
    502
    104
    Not possible.
    First, the only commando with 3 missiles hardpoints and ECM (COM-2D) has its engine capped at 210 (~150kph).
    Second, missiles are too heavy too allow a missile heavy commando to reach the highest speed. Mount 2 SMR6s on a COM-3A, plus 2 tons of ammo (you wish you could load one more), you don't have the tonnage for more than a 225 (160kph). And it's not even a viable build since you have no backup weapon and a very low ammo count.
    3 SRM4s are possible on a COM-2D, but it's either very slow, either without ECM and with low armor.

    If you ask me, Jenner all the way.
     
  17. Motörhead

    Motörhead Benefactor

    1,127
    248
    58
    http://mwo.smurfy-net.de/mechlab#i=154&l=fdae9070f77c3e4d4077332c75be97850b6625c9

    gonna run this to test.

    not that works bad now :D

    http://postimg.org/image/tt87qw7s5/full/
     
  18. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,002
    578
    199
    On the 2D i run 2SRM4@2t Ammo + MLas + ECM + XL210
    On the other ones can load 2SRM4@2t Ammo + 2MLas + XL225.

    Sure the Jenner is better in every case, but it also has some Tonnage more and JJs. You can't compare chickens with ducks. But with the SRM.Buff finally 500+ Scores with the little COMs are easier to achieve. All the Highscores until now are with QuadMLas in the DK. With the Buff the other Variants are more playable than before. I like it. :)
     
  19. Excalibaard

    Excalibaard 101 010 Staff Member

    5,290
    1,110
    269
    http://mwo.smurfy-net.de/mechlab#i=5&l=ee5744bd6a0fae5b028911703a5133582f32f6e0

    I think you're right :( well I have the jenners mastered anyway :p
     
  20. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    http://mwo.smurfy-net.de/mechlab#i=157&l=860c4916b05c76955c1921d97cac8887c06fd5b2

    That was the LG fit I was testing on PTS and it worked like a dream. Literal bombs as I leapt in on the target.... o_O
     
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast