WHK-C "WuHawk" (1 x cUAC10, 2 x cLPL, 3 x cERML)

Thread in 'Warhawk Omni Builds' started by Skaav, Jan 30, 2016.

  1. Skaav

    Skaav New Member

    14
    1
    5


    Been running this with a very solid average performance and the abilty to get crazy damage/kills.

    Modules: Radar Dep,Adv. Seismic Sensor,cUAC10 Cooldown, cERML Range

    Alternatively you can drop the TC for more DHS/AMMO
     
  2. enileph

    enileph Star Lord

    4,203
    518
    201
    Your build is energy heavy, yo will not want to drop TC1.
    You can think of having less DHS for more firepower however.
     
  3. Aylek

    Aylek Administrator Staff Member

    2,761
    528
    197
    Nope, you need that "A" right arm for the -30% UAC jam chance.

    This is my current build on the C atm:

     
  4. enileph

    enileph Star Lord

    4,203
    518
    201
    Indeed, better arm.
    In that case use the Config C Left Arm for 4% energy heat reduction?
     
  5. Skaav

    Skaav New Member

    14
    1
    5
    WIth the A right arm you loose the actuators, which did not work for me at all. The mech becomes so extremely clunky that you cant really use the extra mobility the chassis gives you, also im not really an SRM fan on the bigger mechs.
    Having the Jam Quirk is nice, but its not really something you can rely upon anyhow and the velocity really isnt a "must have" either.

    Been trying diffrent versions but, going for an cuac10/laser combo, this was the most versatile while having the heatdissipation to still heavily commit if needed. Using the A RA gives you nice quirks, but you basically drop 2 much needed Energy Hardpoints AND the Actuators.
     
  6. Aylek

    Aylek Administrator Staff Member

    2,761
    528
    197
    You can cheat on the actuators by mounting lower arm actuators on your energy (left) arm. ;-)
     
  7. Skaav

    Skaav New Member

    14
    1
    5
    There is no left arm with actuators, only the C and B Right arm give actuators (which is totally bullshit btw ), unless there is a way and im a terrible noob xD

    I always assumed this was some kind of misguided balancing effort by PGI
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2016
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast