urbie builds!

Thread in 'MechWarrior Online' started by L3mming2, Jan 22, 2015.

  1. L3mming2

    L3mming2 Well-Known Member

    105
    35
    27
    If i remember right, i heard in the town hall;
    - eng cap between 180 and 220
    - and the chassi will have a tonage reduction bonus of 6 t (he said somthing about it being inpsoible if not)

    if u look at the stock load out of the UM-R63* you will see the sum of all components and armor is above 30t (this is without taking any weigt of the chassi ore engine in account!)

    so knowing this i have made some urban mech builds by using a spider chassi and removing 6 t of armor..

    first 1; (take the 1 ML and split it in 2 SL) (and if it was a urby it would have 194 armor (took the remaining 16 armor from the spider too..))



    i think with some nice quirks (machine gun and AC/10 related) this is a viable build whith would exell at city combat.

    what do you think?
     
  2. enileph

    enileph Star Lord

    4,203
    518
    201
    UM-R60

    There should be space for another 2x MG.
     
  3. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    If you follow twitter its all up in the air on max engine sizes but latest tweet from Russ was 180-210..
     
    L3mming2 likes this.
  4. skribs

    skribs Min-Max Maniac

    1,690
    164
    48
    Tonnage reduction of 6 tons? Meaning it can fit 36 tons of stuff into a 30 ton mech?
     
  5. L3mming2

    L3mming2 Well-Known Member

    105
    35
    27
    yes, but i fear its atatched to the 60 engine dont know i hope it is not.

    russ said he would make the urban mech viable,
    i see 3 ways for that to happen;
    a) giving it the same speed as the other IS lights (personaly i think this is stupid we already have those...)
    b) give it the tonage quirk and make it fast enof to get in and out of cover (and able to run around a building faster than the assault/heavy mech it just poked in the back) so a bit above 100kph (they can do this to by making a armor weight reduction of 90% if they dont want to make a - 6t quirk)
    c) give it a ridicullus cd quirk for its main weapon (+ 60-70% cd quirk for AC/10) now u can jj on top of a dire wolf for a ride in to batle and serve him as a turret vs lights and extra dps in a pouche (this sounds awsome but not realy practical...)
     
  6. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    They seem to be going towards not having a fixed engine which is what gave the bonus tonnage.
     
    enileph likes this.
  7. L3mming2

    L3mming2 Well-Known Member

    105
    35
    27
    whitout any w8 quirk (ore somting simmilar) i dont know how they want it viable, if it was posible to make a dakka 30 t light viable without that it would be used on a spider..
     
  8. L3mming2

    L3mming2 Well-Known Member

    105
    35
    27
    ps i realy cant w8 till they relaese all stats of it :p
     
  9. Nemesi12824

    Nemesi12824 Active Member

    98
    18
    17
    I vote for 90% CD on the AC10! Urbie Super MG Turret!
     
  10. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,002
    578
    199
    I think, it is pretty clear, that the Urbanmech is not designed to be viable on the competitive scene, but simply FANSERVICE. If you really believe, it has any advantages over other Lights, then you should really wake up, Neo. :stig:
     
  11. L3mming2

    L3mming2 Well-Known Member

    105
    35
    27
    the only reason why i assume it will be vaible is becaus russel said so, and they have shown they are willing to give mechs massive quirks to get them viable.. (by viable i dont mean tier 1)
     
  12. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,002
    578
    199
    even so.. what do you expect? It has a bad engine cap (suicide on a Light), it has not enough Weight to carry a big BFG with enough Ammo and secondary Weapons. The only thing you can do is to go for Sniping, but with a (ER)PPC, or classic Super Chicken 2x ERLLas.. ? There are better Lights for that (incl. ECM). It is FANSERVICE. And so only Die-Hard-Fans should pay the bucks for it. The rest who wants competitive gameplay will ignore it in their drop decks. Grinding with a super slow Light is aweful. I know it from the Adder, and this Mech is even worse.
     
  13. skribs

    skribs Min-Max Maniac

    1,690
    164
    48
    I have yet to play the Adder but I found Kit Fox quite fun.
     
  14. enileph

    enileph Star Lord

    4,203
    518
    201
    As said, if the engine sap they set is high enough this is actually useful, having better weapon than a spider, and a bit more functiional in terms of big guns.
    We will see.
     
  15. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Its a playstyle thing as I get plenty of kills and damage with my Adder - what were you running?
     
  16. PyckenZot

    PyckenZot Benefactor

    1,029
    404
    89
    All this talk about Urbies made my JM6-DD jealous,...

    Beware the "Wannaburbie" !!!

     
  17. SirHitman

    SirHitman Well-Known Member

    161
    60
    27
    They said the Sub 100 engines would likely have a negative weight so thats probably the extra tonnage you get.
     
  18. Blagg Zear

    Blagg Zear Star Lord

    5,002
    578
    199
    I get plenty of kills/damage myself (2x LPLas + TC1), but it's still awful with the low speed. 1on1 against any faster light could be frustrating. But as a ninja-assassin, it's ok. But there are better Mechs for that.
     
  19. Dr. Danger

    Dr. Danger Advanced Member

    262
    7
    20
    But why?
    IIRC the tonnage of the reactor in MWO includes the weight of the cockpit and gyroscope from Table Top BattleTech.
    So, the weight should be 3 tons for the cockpit and IIRC variable for the gyro depending on chassis weight or reactor (not sure after all those years) + actual reactor weight.
     
  20. Remarius

    Remarius Star Lord

    3,374
    546
    192
    Because in proper Battletech you can't change the engine outside a complete factory rebuild and XL engines themselves only come produced in certain sizes (a single big manufacturer might only actually have 5-6 engine sizes only and 1 nearby). That means the Urbanmech speed differential shouldn't be that extreme but as engine changes are mostly unlimited in MWO suddenly you're not looking at a max 32.4 KPH mech competing with 40-50 KPH mechs having to compete with mechs travelling at up to 170 KPH, literally five times their speed. To make the mech even vaguely usable there are only 2 approaches - either fudge the engine if its fixed, and remember they already tweaked weights below certain amounts to make lights more competitive, or don't have the engine as fixed (which I suspect will be their answer from the twitter questions).
     
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast
top-fast